From: Annie (annie@geekbabe.com)
Date: Wed Aug 07 2002 - 08:02:35 CDT
In this mailing:
Org List
This mailing
Kia Ora
Slumber party
Bitch-O-Gram
Time to speak up and volunteer
Suggestion
Many comments on a variety of subjects
Various items
More date comments
Summary Schedule of Activities (updated)
Administrivia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Org List:
This is the DLV 2003 Organizational Mailing List (dlvorg@geekbabe.com)
Replies to this message will be forwarded to the DLVORG list and not
the DLV-Announce or DLV-Discuss list.
Ongoing activity database appears on line at:
http://www.geekbabe.com/annie/org03arc/acts.html
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
This mailing:
Sorry about the length of this one. Material just kept coming and coming
and coming up to Wednesday morning. Several people comment on many topics,
so if you just skim, please skim carefully. :)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kia Ora:
Michelle (NZ) writes:
>No I'm not swearing. Its Maori for "G'Day". I'm saying this simply to
>add a multi-cultural touch this otherwise dull and boring e-mail! :-)
I thought you were talking about rental cars. :)
Hafa adai! (10 trivia points ... :)
. . . . .
>Golf and Air Tours
>Seems like we may get a clash with these if we're not careful and I for
>one would like them to be on separate days.
>I really like the idea of earlier Tee times for the golf as well. As I
>recall I was second to last to arrive this year, Cat being last(??) and
>I remember waiting round at my hotel for an hour after getting ready
>thinking I don't want to be there too early and be the first one there!
>Maybe I should have asked when everyone else was going to get there
>rather than when was the latest we should arrive!!!!
>And just to add to my preferences :-) that the swim party not be on
>either the golf or Air Tour days.
>So allowing for Julie, Mindy, Densie, Gina we get....
>Wed = Pool Party
>Thu = Air Tours
>Fri = Golf
>Nope that doesn't work for Julie so...
>Wed = Pool Party
>Thu = Golf
>Fri = Air Tours
>Nope that doesn't work for Denise 'cause she wants Air Tours on Wed and
>Thurs
>So!
>[Right about now I figured this was too hard and decided not add any
>more intellectual weight to the problem]
:-)
I can see golf and swimming being mutually exclusive, since Mindy is
doing both of them, but I'm sure both Densie and Gina will be quite
flexible for air tours, and they can be scheduled easily. Of the three,
it seems to me that air tours could be rescheduled more easily than the
other two if necessary.
Comments, Gina, Densie, Mindy, anybody?
. . . . .
>Tropicana Pool Area.
>Not being an expert and only based on casual observation I would say
>that there are several shaded areas although whether they could be
>"booked" or "reserved" is something that would have to be investigated.
>The pool area is VERY large and accessible form the back car park
>without going through the casino although you need to go through the
>hotel area for a short way.
>And if I understand the suggestion correctly, this could be used as a
>location for the daily cocktail hour. In conjunction with a more
>structured shuttle service this could work out well where everyone at
>the south end of the strip can meet there and go elsewhere as a group.
>Again parking access out the back is easy and not a horrendously long
>walk as in some places. Mind you I guess that applies to most of the
>older hotels compared to the new mega monster hotels.
The way things seem to be falling in place, it looks like convenient
happy hours will occur at various places just preceding various other
activities. Unless those who strongly favor a fixed-place recurring
happy hour say "hold it" very shortly, it looks like we will indeed have
a daily happy hour, but at various locations.
I would like to hear some more chatter from the infield regarding the
idea of a shuttle service. If it's something that we want, I think we
need to make some decisions on it very early in the game.
I'll add this as a question to the masses in the next mailing, to see
if there appears to be a demand for this.
. . . . .
>Conditions of Participation.
>Sounds OK to me without being onerous it highlights the conditions of
>attendance.
>May put one or two first timers off, especially if they feel there's
>pressure on them to reserve for activities when they haven't been out
>before.
Actually, the more I think about it, that note about activity signup
could easily be omitted, and that subject could be covered when we do
such a signup after people have registered.
I do want to avoid turning off the newcomers.
Looking back, I think the activity signup method did an excellent job
of weeding out most of the no-shows this year.
>Also I think some of us (me for example) may have decided quite late
>(but prior to the day) not to attend the Slumber party. How many people
>have E-mail access while in LV? And who cares.
>So maybe we just need to add a rider that we promise to cancel up to x
>days before the start of DLV?
Hmmmm ... I can see that working in reverse. Consider Cathy Closetcase
who decides on the night of April 21 (far after the x day has elapsed)
that she is not ready for DLV. Without the deadline, I can see her
sending a nice "I'm just not ready for this" note, as people have done
almost all years, but with the deadline, I can see her blowing this off
and being one of the no-contact no-show people.
The more I think, though, I believe we don't even need to cover the
activity signup in the conditions of participation, but do it at the
signup time.
. . . . .
>Slumber Party.
>I'm guilty!!! I said I'd go and didn't show.
{Hand slap! >>WHACK!<<}
>In part I had already decided it was too hard mainly because of the Air
>tours the next morning but having said that I didn't follow up about
>the the access details for the location etc. Subsequent to DLV I heard
>there was limited parking and not being able to take my car would have
>put me off if had decided to go.
>Therefore....
>I, for one, am expecting a grumpy note from Annie, to go with grumpy
>comments at Flex on the Sunday night and then on IRC chat. As soon as
>it arrives I promise to promptly read and delete said message :-)
>That's all for now
>Bye
Bibi! :)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Slumber party:
LeeAnna writes:
>Annie...Hi from LeeAnna. Cindy and I have discussed the Bitch-O-Gram
>idea and we both feel that just you mentioning the donation idea is all
>that is needed.
What I think I'm hearing is that you think a nice note (as opposed to a
separately mailed bitch-o-gram) in the mailings, suggesting a donation
to those who wish absolution and restitution, is in order. Am I correct?
>Several reasons have been given for the poor attendance to the slumber
>party, most being fare reasons. Cindy and myself have chosen not to do
>another Slumber Party in 2003 for the group so if anyone wants to run
>with the idea, please feel free to do so.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bitch-O-Gram:
Cindy writes:
>I have talked to Leeanna and we are both over the disappointment of
>the no shows.
>We just want the org to use this experience as a building stone for
>future DLV'S. As I read the rules of conduct it looks like a good step
>in making sure the girls understand they are committing to an event and
>there presence will be a must do part of there event.
Thanks, Cindy, unfortunately this is one thing that just did not work
out as planned.
>We grew so fast that this is something we lost control of. I feel most
>of the no-shows will be part of the non-returners and couldn't care
>less about a Bitch-O-Gram.
That is a very good point. Time will tell. It will be interesting to see
what our 2002-2003 return rate is.
>ONWARD
And upward! :)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time to speak up and volunteer:
Monique writes:
>DLVOrg Sisters:
>I've been monitoring all the threads for DLV'03 in the DLVOrg list, and
>I'm finally getting off the fence to once again assist in any way that
>I can for DLV'03.
>Limo Tour: Since this is such a popular venue of DLV, I'm willing to
>volunteer to coordinate the limo tour. Where this fits into the time
>slot, I'm open to suggestion, but seeing the current general schedule,
>maybe Thruday evening might be a good time to do the Limo Tour. Just
>as a reminder, the limo tour for DLV'02 was about 3 hours beginning at
>10pm.
Thanks, Monique. :) You got the job! I see a few places where this will
fit on the schedule, including Wednesday after Club Girl Talk, Thursday
after {whatever} or even Friday after the Annual Mixer.
>Payment, etc can be discussed and figured out in future DLVOrg
>emails, IMHO.
True, and the company we've been using (Bell-Trans) has been cool about
adjusting the number of vehicles, etc. at short notice, so this will
most likely not require an advance payment except for those who are
not gonna be present at the first part of DLV.
One suggestion I would make would be to have some kind of arrangement
made for liquid refreshments in advance.
>Nametags: I think these worked really well at DLV'02 and I once again
>offer my services to be primary nametaker, nametag hand-u-outer, etc..
Since there are no other applicants for that job, looks like you got it.
I'll be sure to get you lists that have larger print this year. :)
>Conditions of Participation: I'd like to digetst this abit before a
>formal response to the group, but after reading the first paragraph, I
>have some concerns about the 'letter of the law' vs guidelines.
>I, like most of us, agree that we don't wish to have some of the
>problems we had at DLV'02, but in the same breath, I don't want to see
>the "Conditions of Participation" worded in a way that will scare off
>new or first time girls coming out to join us.
>Afterall, DLV'02 had a record # of new DLV attendees or first time out
>in public and I wish to see that continue for DLV'03. IMHO. Once I've
>had time to really read and digest the 'conditions of participation',
>I'll speak my two cents worth when appropriate.,
I'll be sending the group a second draft of this within a week or so.
I don't want to scare any newcomers off. One good test of this would be
to see how many people bring up the registration screen, click to view
the conditions of participation, and proceed no further.
>Hotels: I'm having a bit of a problem suggesting that the DLV attendees
>stay in a central hotel. Why? This gets back to more 'conventional
>conventions' like SCC for example. I agree with the group that we
>should 'recommend' hotels, but logistics aside (which will always be an
>issue irrespective), I tend to lean towards we as the DLVOrg group
>'recommend' hotels, from the IP to the Sahara and those more upscale
>properties.
I do think we need to continue to give suggestions on where to stay, but
not insist or require for any of several reasons already discussed.
We've heard from the people who favor the Sahara and the IP, and from
those who want an upscale option such as the Bellagio, but we really
have not heard from the contingent (which does include longtimers and
volunteers) who prefer smaller and in some cases way off the beaten path
places. Do we want to suggest one of these as well? (Or do the people
who stay at those want their space? <semi grin>)
>Personally speaking, I have no intention in spending $200+ a night to
>stay at the Beliago when I can spend $39 at the Sahara during the week
>($120 for Fri/Sat). I'd happily go to the more upscale hotels to window
>shop, to view and take it all in, but not to crash at. Again, IMHO.
This is the way I feel about it too. (I also doubt that the Bellagio has
the $2.99 steak/eggs special either. :) Different people have different
priorities WRT room selection. For me, a clean phone line is important,
but most others probably do not care about that.
>More call for daytime activities: I agree with the feedback with
>respect to more daytime activities. I once again, volunteer, to again
>suggest we have another Souther Belle Socity Social during the
>afternoon. I'm very willing to coordinate this entire afternoon
>(suggested times 1-3pm). I was very pleased with the number of DLV
>attendees that came to the SBS social at DLV'02 and the 'comfort
>level' stats that Annie provided to us. This is what SBS is all about,
>just getting girls out so they can meet, talk and socialize. In fact,
>that is also what DLV is all about :) Comments girls?
Do you have a preferred day/time for this yet?
>Karokee: Well, Tina and I will be very upset if we don't have a chance
>to do Karokee again. Perhpas a pre-DLV event.
IIRC, Flex has this on Monday, which does not officially hit our
proposed schedule, and Goodtimes has this on Wednesday, which does.
Since this is a fixed-day/time thing, I'm gonna put this in for
Wednesday following the Club Girl Talk, keeping in mind that this can
easily be two-tracked.
>ShowGirls of Magic: Annie, Thanks for making this part of the DLV'03
>venue. I know the girls will just LUV this venue!
You're very welcome. As soon as the schedule is solid, I'll contact Tiny
and get the ball rolling WRT the administrivial details. I get the
feeling that they will work with us as far as paying individually, etc.
That's one big advantage of the smaller showrooms.
>Well, my first pass regarding DLV'03. This is what I really enjoy about
>being part of the DLVOrg group... we bounce ideas off each other and
>work togehter. We had a fantastic turnout at DLV'02 and I'm have a
>feeling that DLV'03 will not only be a great time, but will have
>another record turnout!
>Huggs to ya'll,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Suggestion:
Danielle (not a DLVORG member) writes:
>...I would like to make a suggestion for a DLV activity. A trip to one
>of the strip clubs might be fun. I know its something my wife and I
>would enjoy. I'm sure there are other girls that would like to visit a
>club while dressed. Just something to think about. Thanks.
In a response, she clarified that she meant a club where strippers
perform, as opposed to a nightclub on the Strip. :)
I seem to remember that somebody mentioned the Satin Saddle last year as
a possibility. This is (was?) a NLV club catering to the lesbian set.
I said I would bring this up as a suggestion.
Comments?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Many comments on a variety of subjects:
Tina writes:
>>+Conditions Of Participation:
>><snip>
>>+2. That you dress and act as a lady or a gentleman (or both, at times).
>I know that what you mean here is the freedom to do some events in boy
>mode and some in girl mode, depending on comfort level; but, the
>wording seems confusing and almost seems to endorse that "mixed" mode
>approach.
>How about something like:
>That you dress and act as a member of the gender you are presenting.
>Please feel free to attend any event in either boy mode or girl mode,
>whichever makes you more comfortable at the time.
I would like to keep the "lady or gentleman" wording in there, since
that implies a standard of behavior. "Dress and act as a member of the
gender you are presenting" would certainly include such things as
hookers and pimps, which brought on this whole brouhaha. I think "L or
G" can be merged into what you proposed above.
I'm planning to issue the group a second draft of this as soon as all
the comments are in and I play with the wording a bit.
. . . . .
>TG Guide submission:
<snip>
>>Comments?
>Looks fine, except for one little typo on "rplaced". :-) Laura, keep
>up the good work. I've seen this publication and it's great.
. . . . .
>>Here's an idea for the pub crawl, and, it looks like our evening
>>schedule is starting to take shape. :) We've had a request for one
>>of the "artsy" shows, and I'm sure not everybody will go to that.
>>Pub crawl might be a good second-track option for that timeslot.
>>Comments?
>Excellent idea!! Are you looking at Thursday night for that?
Well, since it looks like Thursday is the only totally open evening ...
. . . . .
>>Date concern:
>>Julie writes:
>>>Now for the bad news... it looks as if I may have a problem attending
>>during those dates.
>Damn calendar. Damn, damn calendar. We've been fighting it for 2003
>all the way, twisting and turning. I cried when I heard this news. :-(
><Major cut and juxtapose>
>>Various employers have vacation policies ranging from the sensible to
>>the downright ridiculous and it was mentioned that some do not like
>>people to take off parts of two consecutive weeks.
>Yes, that was and remains the big flaw in model #2. Regardless of the
>day DLV starts, I've got to bail out on Sunday (or very early Monday
>like 2 AM at the latest) and the red-eye flights to my city just aren't
>there to get me into the office on Monday at 9 AM. So I voted for #1
>based on my preference. If we re-voted and #2 won, I could still make
>it to a big part of DLV and wouldn't be heart-broken, speaking just for
>myself.
Before we consider a re-vote, let's wait until toward the end of the
comment period and see if any more negative comments or objections come
in. If there are a significant number of them, then I would say
reconsidering the dates would be in order. That's why we have the
call for comments.
I have a feeling if we changed to #2 or anything else, there would be an
equal number of lockouts.
Let's face it, there is no ideal time for DLV in 2003. :( Damn Calendar.
If we do reconsider dates, I want to do it VERY VERY carefully, and very
methodically, being damn sure we aren't walking into a sure no-winner.
>As I remember the discussion (and I did check the old mailings),
>starting earlier than Thursday for #2 locked out the N+I girls for those
>nights. I think it is safe to predict some significant drop-off after
>the weekend (based on past years) if we switch to #2. I guess no matter
>when we schedule it this year, somebody is going to miss something. I
>say again: damn calendar!!
See below. Both 1 and 2 allowed the N+I people to attend DLV. Another
option (grab can of worms, walk to can opener) would be to have DLV the
week after N+I, terminating on Mothers Day weekend. We have done that
three years out of six and did not have any objections until 2000.
. . . . .
>There seems to be quite a black hole here between Friday April 25 and
>Saturday May 4. Are we off on some major bender or serving time on the
>county chain gang? Pardon me boss, I think I broke my spike heel and
>chipped another nail this time.
The first week of May is N+I. That will lock me (and those others who
attend N+I) out of at least some of DLV, and possibly lock me out of all
of it. If I do attend N+I, I'm up bright and early every day and over
there at the Convention Center all day. If somebody else from our
department goes to N+I (it's somebody else's turn) then I'm locked out
totally, since we minimize the people gone over any one period. I will
not know if I am the one representing our department at N+I this year
until after the first of 2003. I've been the one the past 4 years now,
so if anybody else so much as peeps that they might like to do it, they
(rightly so) get to do it.
Do we want to consider the first full week in May, ending on Mothers
Day?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Various items:
Anya writes:
>It seems like there are some good ideas here. I thought I would render
>my comments and ideas.
[snip]
>>+1. That when you register for Diva Las Vegas, and when you sign up for
>>+DLV activities (activity sign-up will occur about a month prior to DLV),
>>+you do so with the intent of following through, showing up, and
[bobbitt]
>I can understand having a registration for planning purposes. But let
>us not hold it against anyone if plans suddenly change.
We do understand and don't hold it against anybody, but we expect the
common courtesy of either a cancellation or a brief note saying the
plans have changed, as opposed to a no-write no-show no-phone no-nothing.
>>+2. That you dress and act as a lady or a gentleman (or both, at times).
>Agreed.
>>+ a. That your dress and behavior be appropriate to the time, place
>>and circumstance of each activity.
>Also in agreement.
>>+b. That you refrain from dressing or acting in a manner intended to
>>+flaunt transgenderism, or a manner which is intended to draw attention
>I'm concerned about the wording on this. I think we need to clarify
>this. I would hope that me wearing a striped pullover dress and white
>sandals would be all right. That kind of stands out. What are we
>getting at here. Who is going to be the judge of that. I may just feel
>like wearing my six inch heel platform sandals. Let's not get into
>setting a dress code.
I don't ever envision us having the likes of a Studio 54 doorman who
looks over the dress of our people. (This is DLV, not Miss Vera's.)
Let me work on the wording of this. What I want to say is no obvious
mixed-mode or skagdrag. There are also a few who like to pull the
in-your-face I'm-a-tranny-you-got-a-problem-with-that-Mac highly
confrontational bit. This is rare, but we want to state that it is
not cool.
"Appropriate to the time, place, and circumstance" does give quite a bit
of latitude. For most of our activities this ranges from the very casual
tourista mode to very dressy. Had the Metamorphosis Ball happened, that
would have been a totally different set of circumstances.
I want some language that is brief and gets these points across.
>>+c. That you refrain from illegal activities. PATENTLY ILLEGAL BEHAVIOR
>>+WILL NOT BE TOLERATED, AND IF NECESSARY WILL BE REPORTED TO THE
>>+APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES.
>I am definetely in agreement. I am totally uncomfortable around people
>who engage in illegal and dangerous behavior. We cant afford to have
>people unwittingly fall into a trap.
And this was really what brought on this whole thing. :(
>>+d. That you be polite and courteous when dealing with other DLV
>>+participants, vendors, merchants, hotel/restaurant/showroom staff,
>>+and the general public.
>Also in agreement. Lack of courtesy only spreads negative news and
>reputations fast.
I added this after two shopkeepers mentioned to me that they had
problems with one of our people. We shouldn't even have to mention
this, but ...
>>+3. That you agree to attend Diva Las Vegas with the understanding that
>>+it is at your own risk, and that DLV organizers, volunteers, and other
[snip]
>Such is true too. After all we are a gathering, not a business
>enterprise. There are really no guarantees in life when you think
>about it, scary as it may be.
. . . . .
>>Air tours:
[cut-paste]
>>>My choice for a day would be Thursday or Friday morning. Preferrably
>>>not after a late party or something.
>Agreed, and lets do buffet at Bellagio, i missed it last time.
I'll pencil in a Bellagio buffet lunch for Thursday then. If we have
to move it, then we move it.
. . . . .
>>>>2. Have to defend Imperial Palace. We had a group of 5 T-girls and 1 SO
[---8<---]
>>>We should have had a total of 8-9 DLV people there this past year. I do
[--->8---]
>>>Checking back on the survey results, four IP people responded, only one
>>>was dissatisfied.
[---8<---]
>>>>We used the back entrance/exit to access the parking and had
>>>>absolutely no problems. Only difficulties were if we entered off the
[deletia]
>I'm glad it worked out for you. I must admit that when i ate at the
>buffet at the IP it was pretty poor.
IP has two buffets. Big one up front, smaller one back in the Teahouse
coffee shop. I've avoided the big one up front due to the fact that
people have told me it sucks. I've been to the Teahouse many times, both
off the menu and buffet, and never had a bad meal, although I admit that
if you are expecting haute cuisine, you will be very disappointed.
>Never stayed at the IP. But it
>just strikes me as a place with lower standards of service than major
>properies operated by MGM Mirage, Park Place, or Mandalay Resort
>Group. I myself would not stay at the IP. But that is only my humble
>opinion.
I stayed there once long before DLV, mainly because the places I usually
stay were booked. No complaints except for the foot and vehicle traffic
in the area. My room was very nice, and I've seen several DLV peoples'
rooms, which I've considered anywhere from very OK to very nice.
. . . . .
>>>The daily cocktail hour, or a daily buffet luncheon at a fixed place
>>>and time, is a great idea so we could have a 'common point' to connect
>>>at...
>Good idea, but lets eat in a different resort each day. Best breakfasts
>in buffets i have had were in Bellagio, Mandalay Bay, Paris. The Rio
>and the MGM also do a good breakfast. I would also try the Aladdin and
>The Palms. If you want a sitdown non buffet type of breakfast, the
>Grand Lux in the Venetian is top rated. All these locations do a good
>lunch as well.
Hmmmm .... I'm hearing a call for consistency and a call for diversity
here. Sound familiar? :)
As for the happy hour, it looks like by default it will be at various
locations, often just before a meal, prior to a feature activity of
the evening.
As for breakfast/brunch, the only noonish meal we have proposed so far
is at the Bellagio. I doubt if people would wanna have a daily meal at
those prices. :)
. . . . .
>>>Is Sasha's was the place that people were leaving because they
>>>couldn't get a drink?
>>Yes, Saturday evening. Severely understaffed. All other times I've
>>been in there the service was good.
>I think we need to ensure that Sasha's is up to the task of serving
>large groups in an efficient manner. There is no excuse for poor or
>reduced service.
I think they will be. They had been open something like 6 weeks as of
DLV this year and still climbing the learning curve.
>However when I want to Sasha's for dinner on a Friday night a month
>after DLV, it was great.
As it has been every non-DLV time I've been there too.
. . . . .
>>>Personally, this isn't a problem but it is my understanding that many
>>>companies frown on employees' fragmenting 2 weeks to obtain a long
>>>weekend.
[deletia]
>Such is true, many employers will only give vacation in full weeks. The
>majority has spoken, and I think the right decision was made. Can't
>please everyone.
I tend to agree with you, but this year is not producing a set of
dates that is ideal, as is discussed in depth here.
. . . . .
(Slumber party)
[deletia maxima]
>I don't think a slumber party is a good idea. Lets scratch it this
>year. After all there are lots of good hotel rooms for sleeping.
Well, it won't happen unless we have people volunteering to do it. It's
one of the things that did not turn out well, despite a good idea and
what I consider to be a first-class implementation.
I don't see anybody jumping up and down waving their hands on this one,
so I think it's safe to say it will not occur this year.
. . . . .
(Hotels)
[deletia media]
>>>The choice of hotel should remain a personal preference and should
[snip]
>I agree with this comment. Sometimes I wonder if having a preferred
>hotel is a good idea anymore. I always prefer hotels operated by
>Mandalay Resort Group, even if most think they are not T-friendly. And
>some like downtown, and others like off strip, or Bellagio, etc.
We want to suggest hotels for our people for (at least) two reasons:
1. So people who do not know Las Vegas will know they are staying in
a place that's known to be decent and t-friendly or t-oblivious.
2. So people who want to stay in the same facility as other DLV people
can do so.
There are other considerations. One off-line discussion touched on the
marketing power we might have if we focused our business on certain
properties. Another is the transportation issue.
The hotels we suggest will most likely be voted upon around the first
of November.
>And so it goes.
HEY, that's MY line! (or at least part of it)
>It's good to put it all on the table now.
True. :)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
More date comments:
>Annie--
> The week of April 22-27 is my 1st choice---5/1-6 is my 2nd choice.
> Look forward to your monthly correspondence.
. . . . .
>Any chance of making it longer, or sooner? Just kidding, looks fine.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary Schedule of Activities (updated):
Date Day Time Activity
========== ========= =========
Apr 22 Tue
Eve Pre-DLV get-together
Apr 23 Wed
5:30pm Happy Hour (Sasha's)
6:30pm Dinner (Sasha's / Milano's)
8:00pm Club Girl Talk
10:30pm Karaoke (Goodtimes)
Apr 24 Thu
Morn Air tours
Noonish Bellagio buffet lunch
Apr 25 Fri
Eve Happy Hour (Carluccio's)
after Carluccio's dinner
after Annual Mixer
after Dance Night
May 04 Sat
7:00pm Happy Hour (San Remp)
8:00pm Buffet dinner, San Remo
10:30pm Showgirls Of Magic
May 05 Sun
Aft High Tea
Eve Farewell Get-together
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Administrivia:
This is the Diva Las Vegas 2003 organizational list.
One address for all items regarding this list, additions, removals,
changes, submissions, questions, etc.:
dlvorg@geekbabe.com <--- NOTE: all lower case
Please do not send binary attachments (photos, etc.) directly to the
list, as the list processor will not properly handle them. If you want
to send photos and the like, mail to: annie@annie.net
Archives of this list appear on the web at:
http://www.geekbabe.com/annie/org03arc/
To unsubscribe: Simply reply to this message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE
in either the Subject: field or the first line of an OTHERWISE BLANK
message body. The word "unsubscribe" (case is insignificant) should be
the only item in the subject field or the first line of the message,
justified to the left.
NOTE: WHEN UNSUBSCRIBING, THE FROM: LINE OF YOUR UNSUBSCRIBE MESSAGE
>>MUST<< HAVE THE SAME ADDRESS AS WHAT WE USE TO SEND TO YOU. IF IT
DOES NOT, THE UNSUBSCRIBE WILL FAIL, AND YOU MAY NOT GET A FAILURE
NOTICE. SPELLING COUNTS.
Please pay attention to the above. Many automated unsubscribe requests
fail for this reason.
To send material to this list: Send submission as regular e-mail to
the address: dlvorg@geekbabe.com
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 27 2002 - 12:08:23 CDT