From: Annie (annie@geekbabe.com)
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 07:58:21 CDT
In this mailing:
Org List
Hotel suggestions
Behavior, dress, and restroom policy
SO's activities
Shopping and cruising
Sarah writes
Skydiving, Galiano [sic], RHPS, etc.
Skydiving and misc.
Tee and tea
Costume party n' stuff
Summary schedule of activities
Administrivia
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Org List:
This is the DLV 2004 Organizational Mailing List (dlvorg@geekbabe.com)
Replies to this message will be forwarded to the DLVORG list and not
the DLV-Announce or DLV-Discuss list.
Ongoing activity database of proposed and scheduled activities on line:
http://www.geekbabe.com/annie/org04arc/acts.html
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hotel suggestions:
One topic we need to start considering and discussing is that of our
hotel suggestions for DLV 2004. A few of the questions to consider are:
1. Do we want to suggest any hotels for our people this year? (Yeah,
I know this is kinda assumed, but I like to ask this question. :)
2. How many hotels do we want to suggest?
3. Which properties do we suggest? A related question is what criteria,
litmus tests, etc., if any, do we use for selection.
We want to have our hotel suggestions published around the first of
December (prior to people actually making plans), meaning we need to do
our voting on them mid November, and our discussion and any negotiation
between now and November, which is about 2 months time.
Unless there are any objections or somebody has a better method, I would
like to make the decision basically the same as we did last year, by
nomination and popular vote of us here.
The nomination assures that at least one of us thinks highly enough of
the property to recommend it to others.
The vote answers the questions of "if", "how many" and "what properties"
all at once and takes into consideration everybody's individual and
collective concerns and special interests.
We've had previous discussion here regarding the Boardwalk and the San
Remo.
Monique, anything to report on the negotiations with the San Remo?
Mindy, we only received one response to our call for comments about the
Boardwalk. I'll (re)post this and go back and dig up the existing
Boardwalk comments and you can then pass them on to the Powers That Be
at the Boardwalk.
If anybody here has any additional comments about the Boardwalk,
please speak now or forever hold them. As of Saturday, Annie ("The
Other Annie") has heard nothing in the way of an apology for the
misunderstanding and incident that occurred at DLV 2002.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Behavior, dress, and restroom policy:
As you know, over the past three months or so our Ad Hoc Committee has
been drafting the new consolidated policy document which covers
behavior, dress, and restroom issues.
The committee, which is co-chaired by Annie and Aiko, would now like
to present the document to you for consideration and hopefully for
approval.
It's on line at the URL:
http://www.drbbs.com/dmr/cpolicy.html
If anybody has difficulty viewing this, or just would like an e-mail
copy of it, just hit REPLY and ask for one.
This covers the topics of behavior, dress, and restroom usage. It has
guidelines for organizers (that's us, gang), guidelines for attendees,
and some general discussion of all topics.
The parts that pertain to attendees will be extracted and used for
the various things they get, such as the large final mailing.
Much of the new document was taken from various existing documents,
combined into one unified source.
I think the most important thing to note is that this document does not
institute any sweeping changes over DLV. No, there's no new draconian
dress code, and nothing has changed regarding the expected behavior of
our people. Those who have read the various dress, restroom, and
behavior notes over the past few years will notice much familiar text.
In particular, no plans that have been made so far for DLV 2004 are
adversely affected by this.
What this document does is to put into writing what we've agreed to do
with regard to planning and implementing DLV.
One item of particular note is that four classifications of activities
are defined, according to public exposure and incident risk. (Actually
three, the fourth being those over which we have absolutely no control.)
The Ad-Hoc Committee has put quite a bit of thought into this document.
I would ask everybody to give us your comments (all of the Ad Hoc
members are on the list here).
Please try to concentrate on the big picture, like is there something
in there that is factually wrong, or is there something that we have
overlooked.
If there are any gross grammatical or spelling errors, please point
them out, but be warned, it may appear that there are more in there
than you think. :)
For example, much of the verbiage of this document was written by
somebody whose native language is not American English, and those who
are accustomed only to 'Merkin may notice some differences in spelling
and phraseology. It was the consensus of the Ad-Hoc group to leave the
non-American spellings and phrasings as is.
I would like to ask everybody to please pay particular attention to the
"enforcement" section toward the end, since this covers most of the
"what if ..." situations, such as "what if somebody shows up for the
limo tour dressed more appropriately for the bedroom", and "what if
somebody gets obnoxious and in-your-face with civilians" and such.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SO's activities:
Sandi writes:
(from a conversation, edited)
>I've given a lot of thought to the role of SO's at dlv. We've attended
>2 so far, and I'm sure we'll be at the next one.
>I would like to do a little more this next year. I would like to open
>our room (at the Hilton) as a hospitality room for SO's and their SO's.
>I thought it would be a good meeting place. The girls can get rides to
>events with each other and we can sit and chat ...
I don't think anybody will have any objections to what you plan to do.
As you know, we've tried various SO activities since 2000, and some have
worked out quite well, while others were poorly attended. I think any
efforts toward increasing the participation of SO's would be
appreciated.
I have a few concerns, and some of these are my own personal feelings.
We've had various proposals for hospitality rooms and such over the
years, but nothing has actually been tried. I have mixed feelings about
them personally. My main concern is that I don't see when they would be
utilized.
However, you're not going to know if it would work unless you try it.
We also want to avoid giving the perception of exclusion, which is a
contentious issue at some t* gatherings ...
If you're going to try this, I would suggest that you very clearly
indicate who would be welcome, so there would be no ill feelings, such
as ...
Would this be for couples only, or would SO's and SO's-of-SO's be
welcome to drop by individually?
How about male SO's? Yes, we've had them.
Same-sex, TG-TG, and other nontraditional SO's?
SO's whose partners are not at DLV? (Yep, had them too.)
How about attendees who have a SO, but SO is not present?
How about nonregistered drop-ins and tag-alongs who may be SO's?
Yes, I know I'm complicating things. :)
Would you have certain open hours at your room? Daytime only? I realize
that you two do want to get out and do many of the activities with the
group.
>I hadn't intended to un-include any one. I was just thinking it would
>be nice to have a place for SO's, or anyone else for that matter, to go
>sometimes when they didn't want to go to a particular event, but also
>didn't want to be alone.
>It might encourage more SO's to attend if there was an
>alternative to all the other events.
>... or go to dinner or a show ourselves.
There's usually no objection to somebody planning additional or
alternative activities throughout the week. We've had some two-tracked
timeslots for a few years now.
However, there are certain activities that we've designated as "sacred",
meaning we don't two-track anything against them, or do anything that
may spoil the turnout for them. These activites are things like the
Welcome Celebration, Annual Mixer, Garden Party, featured Saturday
evening activities ... those which we want to encourage maximum turnout.
>The new tram system will be finished by next DLV and it will be easy
>enough for people to get to the Hilton.
We don't yet know what effect the monorail will have on DLV. My hunch is
that the majority of our people will be far too shy to take it.
I also have expressed concerns about our people taking it in groups and
attracting the wrong kind of attention, but that's a subject for a long
rainy Thursday. :)
. . . . .
>I didn't always want to go to every event, but I hated to see April
>have to go alone. I thought it would be nice if other couples wanted a
>place to meet up and then those wanting to go on to an event could ride
>together and those just wanting company could have that, as well.
Now that you mention it, a number of the couples did kinda go off and
do their own thing much of the time.
If you want to take the initiative to plan more things with couples in
mind, I don't think there would be any objections, and it may indeed
have the effect of increasing the overall participation, which is one of
my pet goals this year. (We seem to be doing a very good job of getting
numbers of people to Las Vegas -- we had 104 check in and make contact
this year -- but it seems difficult to get more than 60% or so of our
people to any one activity.)
>At the scheduled SO event, I was the only one from out of town. The
>other two who showed up, including the person who planned the event,
>were local.
>I would welcome any other input. I was just very disappointed this
>last year when no other SO's from out of town showed up. It may have
>just been a scheduling thing.
There was speculation that the Friday schedule, golf during the day
and the evening activities immediately after, contributed to the
low turnout at the SO gathering.
>I hope more SO's, male or female, will come to DLV if they know there
>are options.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shopping and cruising:
Diane writes:
>Please Pencil me in for the Shopping Excursion on Wednesday around 2:00
>and
>the Mid Day Lake Mead Cruise on Tuesday for either a 12:00 or 2:00
>cruise (leaving LV about 75 minutes prior to cruise)
>(www.lakemeadcruises.com/desertprincess)
Ok, done.
>I've read about the new mall that supposedly going to be opening. Are
>we going to hit that one or the one out on Rt 15 (late year's site) ?
>Either is acceptable to me...
I would suggest the LV Premium Outlets, the new one, just to avoid the
repetition. It's your call, however, please let us know.
>I'll leave the time for the boat trip up to the consensus -
Here's what I'm going to do for now WRT the schedule ...
I'll assume the later (2:00) cruise (going for more turnout) but I'm
gonna put a 12:30 start time on the schedule. Punctuality has been a
major issue at DLV activities, particularly the ones that do have a
drop-dead start time. If we get the 12:30 time (or 10:30 if you change
it to the earlier cruise) planted in everybody's head, I think there
will be fewer people missing it due to time problems.
I'm assuming you'll have a meeting/staging area for carpool, such as
the San Remo parking lot.
That will leave a 15 minute buffer for those who are fashionably late,
or for those who really do get tied up in traffic.
>The trip costs about $19.
Thanks, Diane.
>Is there anyone up in Vegas that semi regularly attends the
>Metropolitan Community Church ? I was thinking of coming up for a
>service next month (I need 600 Freq flyer miles to get a free RT).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarah writes:
>I've not seen anything from on DLV Discussion for quite a while. Did
>that go away or did I get dropped from that list? I'd love to be back
>getting that mail and keeping up on the planning process.
It's still there, just no activity lately.
Discussion list is not very active now, one reason being we have over 8
months to go to DLV, plus the fact that in summer people tend to have
other things going on.
If you don't think you're getting all of it, it's on the web at:
http://www.geekbabe.com/dlv/dlv2004/dlvdisc/
We do want to be sure that any actual planning is done here on this list
and not over there on the discussion forum.
If you wish to involve others in the process, or if there's a case where
you need input or feedback, it would be best to wait until registration
starts and ask on the Discussion Forum, or if you need some information
before then, we can ask in the general monthly mailing. Response has not
been very good to the last few requests for feedback, so I suggest you
wait until the level of interest increases around the first of the year
before you ask, so you will get some reasonable responses.
>By the way, I'm looking at Thursday as the best day for the Art Tour.
>It looks like a double track against GB, but as you mentioned earlier,
>it won't be the only double track on the schedule. I'll have a better
>idea on some of the issues in a month or so.
That is very true. It appears that our daytime hours will be filled with
options, since there does appear to be a high level of enthusiasm this
year toward the planning of daytime activities.
I am going to put the Art Tour on the calendar for Thursday to hold
the place. As everybody can see, our daytime schedule is filling fast.
>Also I love the idea of secretary night, but let's make that Office
>Professional Night if we can? Secretaries are wonderful, but there are
>other parts of the glass ceiling we can bump against as well.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Skydiving, Galiano [sic], RHPS, etc.:
Densie writes:
>>What might be the best way to do this is to just put [indoor
>>skydiving] on the schedule for some afternoon (you pick one)
>How about it you pick one? I'm terrible at picking afternoons.
Ok {flip ... slap} Thursday.
That will conflict least with the other activities I think you would
like to do. Wednesday is air tours, and Friday is (most likely) golf.
>I think you're right, we should wait until regs are coming in. If
>there will be 15 or more, or if we're going to get dressed up for it,
>I'll warn them that we're coming.
We'll get this as one of the activities on the sign-up screen. We should
then know shortly before DLV as to how many will be in for it, giving
plenty of time to adjust if necessary.
>>http://www.geekbabe.com/dlv/dlv2001/rhps/d01419.jpg
>Good picture. For some reason, I don't remember that much PVC and
>latex... were all of those people with us?
Not all of them, but most. Robin and Michelle are very obvious in the
photo. Michael C is in there, and a couple of the others I recognize as
ours too. No, the GG with the "V" is not ours. (She sure don't look like
a virgin to me! :)
>>Well, uh, if anybody wants the experience of being embalmed, or very
>>close to it, they could try Galiano [sic].
>That was use number 1023, right between antidenonant injection fluid
>and varnish stripper, right?
Hmmmm ... "antidenonant" ... I guess that's our word for the day, huh?
>>Anybody local to Las Vegas, or regular at Flex have any more info on
>>this? I assume Flex is co-sponsoring this in the hope of getting the
>>pre-RHPS and post-RHPS bar business from those who are 21 or over.
>Then they shall receive it, in abundance.
And I'm sure they will. If we do RHPS either Friday or Saturday, I'm
sure some of our people will end up there. In a way it is nice to have
24*7 bars in LV.
>>Wednesday or Thursday. Golf on Wednesday would two-track against the
>>Air Tours.
>Oh no, let's don't two-track against the air tours. I want to be able
>to do golf this year.
The way it looks now, air tours will be Wednesday and golf will be
Friday, if they don't want to shift it to Thursday.
>Is there anyone who wants to do both air tours and the high tea?
I'm sure there will be a few, but air tours are early morning and High
Tea is afternoon, right?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Skydiving and misc.:
Jennifer writes:
>I have done the skydiving before at this very same location and it is a
>hoot. One individual had a concern about wigs flying off and I don't
>think that would be a problem. The goggles they give you to protect
>your eyes from the extreme wind would actually help to keep the wig in
>place. However, a quick call to the establishment should verify this.
>Maybe one of our Las Vegas girls could go in and get a demonstration.
>I could support the Secretary night out. Where were you thinking of
>going?.
Last proposal (everything in pencil as of now) was to make it a theme
for the Wednesday HH and dinner and possibly other evening activities.
>I see it as a fun activity geared towards a mainstreaming theme.
>However, knowing some of my sisters, there could be those who dress to
>the extreme and make it slutty. Should there be some ground rules here
There will be ground rules. Mainstream venue means appropriate dress and
behavior. (Actually, that's always been the rule. Some, unfortunately,
did not think it applied to them.)
Of all themes, I see a Secretary Night as one of the least likely to get
inappropriate dress. Yes, I know every company does have their office
tart, however. :) :)
>I see High Tea as a very important event that needs to have some
>clarification now. Who is chairing this event. I thought I was doing it,
>but Mindy is on record as speaking up first. So, who's in charge?
It's probably best if you two decide this.
I suggest you and Mindy contact each other and work out the particulars
of this. If you don't have her e-mail, write and I'll get it to you.
>High Tea should be on a Thurs or Friday afternoon, somewhere between
>2:00pm and 5:00pm. It should be held in an bright and enjoyable
>setting such as in a hotel and done with elegance.
>It will need to be catered, so costs must be considered. It should be
>projected as a wonderful social and given a true chance to succeed.
>I fear placing it on Sunday would give it only a miniscule chance for
>a respectable turn out.
I agree. Although we do have two possible Sundays for an optional
official or unofficial extension to DLV this coming year, neither
seems to be conducive to a large turnout for anything.
>FORGIVE ME! But I think "Trash N Flash and Rocky Horror are poor ideas
>that portray us in a very bad light. I must be getting old, but I would
>like to be recieved as as welcomed guests instead of just being
>tolerated. That's my $.03. (went up due to inflation)
If Trash-N-Flash occurs, it won't be in a mainstream location. I don't
remember a single proposal for anything like that in anything that would
be visible to the general public.
We still don't have any serious or definite proposals for such an
activity.
Rocky Horror is another thing. Even though it is open to the public, the
Ward Cleavers and Joe Sixpacks of the world have no desire to go to it
(that they admit), and our group appears quite tame to those who
frequent RHPS.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tee and tea:
Jamie writes:
>I think moving the Golf is an excellent idea. That way we can continue
>the Limo tour after the Dinner/Show. I do understand that most
>everyone will want to stay at Goodtimes on Wed, and I sure dont want
>to cause undue stress in making them choose between Kareoke and teh
>Limo tour.
Mindy? Any thoughts on doing golf on Thursday?
Hello, Mindy? (tap-tap {blow in mike} is this thing on?) :) :)
>I like Aiko's schedule
>I am one of those "Tea" people. I could go for a Weekday Tea. I also
>would not mind waiting till Sunday, since I probably will stay anyway.
>I am looking forward to the Hard Rock visit, I just dont know what
>constitutes a "Secretaries" outfit. I might have to do some shopping
>(OH DARN).
>If anyone has any special requests for Limo Tour destinations, other
>that what we normally do, send them to Jamie Renae at jamie@jamierenae.com.
It will probably be best to wait until after registration begins to call
for things such as that, then it might be a good question to pose on the
DLV Discussion Forum as it should be active at that time.
>We must have a shopping tour that doesnt conflict with the Glamoue
>Botique.
I'm afraid that there will be conflicts and two-tracking many times
during the daytime this coming year. The number of daytime activities
that have already been planned exceeds the number of timeslots that
are available for them. I know there are others in the works that
do not appear on the schedule yet.
Most every daytime activity is limited-interest or special-interest,
so I do think it is appropriate to multi-track the weekday daytime
timeslots.
Now is the time to mix and match and shuffle and reshuffle the schedule
around.
I would suggest, however, that everybody who is in charge of anything
that's not yet on the schedule, particularly daytime activities, pick a
timeslot. We have almost 4 months until pre-registration opens, and at
that time some will be making their travel plans based on what they see
on the schedule at that time.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Costume party n' stuff:
Yvonne writes:
>I also like the idea of combining Hard Rock with a secretary dress
>theme.
>I also like the idea of keeping the main stream show followed by the
>limo ride. Both seem to be a good combination. The hard part of this
>combo is what night, where it doesn't impact a event the next morning
>or afternoon.
Since we have such a full set of daytime activities developing this
year, there will be some mutual effect between them, particularly those
that begin in the morning and follow popular late-night things the
previous day (actually earlier that morning).
Since we have a number of people who have both golf and the limo
tour high on their priority list for the coming year, we've agreed
to consider not having the limo tour on the night right before golf.
An off-line comment made to me recently was "golf should be Friday", and
we need to note that the golf organizers and the limo organizers have to
cooperate, and to reasonably compromise if necessary. The golf fans may
have to choose whether it's more important to have it Friday, or more
important to have it not follow the limo tour. Likewise, the limo fans
may have a choice of either having it Thursday, or not having it right
before golf.
Comments?
. . . . .
>On RHPS:
>I agree with you that RHPS takes some getting used to. I've been to a
>few during my college years (on Halloween) and never went in costume,
>but I remember it was fun, and alot of colleges students did dress up.
>It was always packed. It was wild on my first experience and was
>totally lost to what was going on, from the BIC lighters to throwing of
>toilet paper and cooked rice. Some of those that were cult followers
>had to explain the history of the event.
>As far as success or failure, alot will depend on how Divine Decadence
>performs. I sorta remember alot of good comments before going in the
>RHPS in '01, I remember we had a big group going into the show, taking
>several rows, in which I attended. I sat in the 1st row. It started
>well, like any RHPS viewing! Most of us were in some sort of costume,
>which may or may not have been based on the movie characters ( I wasn't
>but I was in costume). The photos reflect this.
>However, at the end of the movie and show and when the lights were
>turned back on, I turned around and saw only very few of DLV people
>remained. The majority of our DLV group, had left during the show, for
>different reasons, some reasons why they left was because they had to
>pack (leaving that morning - for RHPS started after 12 midnight),
>others because the show basically was terrible, and were disgusted by
>the poor perfomance, behavior, and presentation of the staff, verbal
>garbage and fights with the college crowd that was there (and
>drinking), or just sought better things to do with their time than to
>watch the movie and the performers.
>If I had known during the show that alot of DLV were leaving, I
>probably would have joined them.
. . . . .
>On the costume party:
>I think all of us need some clarity on this idea... I hope I'm
>understanding this event right.
The details of this activity, should it happen, have not been written
yet. There's really nothing to understand or misunderstand until those
who may plan it, plan it.
>I agree that we should remove all 'sexual' words to this event, like
>slut, fetish, pimp n' ho, flash n' trash.
I have suggested using the term "Trash-N-Flash", thinking it has less of
a sexual tone and sounds less depraved and decadent than the other
terms.
I do think, however, that we must trust that our people are adults and
will be able to understand the concept of this activity, without us
having to analyze every word and discuss ad nauseam every possible
misinterpretation.
>Using such words may give or is giving the wrong assumptions for how
>this event seems to be evolving.
>How about just calling the idea a 'Costume Concept or party' or
>something like 'Halloween or Ethnic or Fantasy Dress night at DLV' or
>something like that.
>It will give this event a more general, positive light, and a more
>general acceptable theme or themes.
The semantics of the activity title will best be handled by those who
propose and plan such an activity, imao.
>It wouldn't have to be specific/limited as erotic, risque, as in body
>spandex, pvc, leather, vinyl, mini skirts, 5" stilleto legs, fishnet
>stockings event. It CAN INCLUDE OTHER ideas as secretaries or ethnic or
>nuns and monks or pink dress and shoes or whatevers.
>As discussed earlier, a possible activity at this party, along with
>general photos of those in costume at the party, would be to do set up
>photo shots at possible different locations, depending on the costumes
>worn to that party (ie each 'secretary' has their photo taken behind a
>secretaries desk in some office, answering a phone or typing or
>whatevers).
>Another possiblity discussed was to attend the current RHPS production
>at midnight in costume, for those that want to dress that way.
>Those that dress in ethnic clothing or whatevers, can change at anytime
>back into something more conservative, casual or blending.
>I think this is the general idea behind this. If I'm wrong this is the
>forum to clarify it.
>NO actual acting it out (ie spanking or any other erotic activity)
>during those photo shooting... if those attending want to do that sort
>of thing for real, can leave and do that in their own privacy.
>It could ALSO be a party just to have some fun, to kick-back, let your
>hair down, relax and have some quality time to socialize at. It doesn't
>HAVE to be required to attend in a costume, some will find it hard
>enough to go enfemme, and that should be enough.
>As a time to socialize, I can see this event early saturday evening. A
>possible (just a small) SUGGESTION is to have this party transition in,
>AFTER the garden party for early evening at the same location.
>The bad point to this idea, is, do we want to do this on the LAST night
>of DLV?
>Come as you want, normal or LIMITED extreme as you want. The focus
>would be to wear a costume of some sort. It will also provide for
>those that want to dress more extreme, an event that they may do so,
>with the option on a 2nd track to going to RHPS (sat?) if they want to
>express their costumes in public, or go on a photo shoot at different
>locations. LV will be busy, it is a SAT night.
>Having a general costume party would provide a opportunity for some to
>wear something in a safe and understanding group that can appreciate
>it, who would otherwise leave it haning in their closets, luggage bags,
>etc. The environment will also be very controlled, and those bold
>enough can go public after the party.
>If this party is private, then rules have already been stated on how
>extreme and what needs to be covered up to attend.
You have raised a number of very good points, and there are a number
of questions to be answered regarding such a thing, particularly ...
1. Do we want such an activity to occur?
2. When do we want such an activity on our schedule? Weekday evening or
our Big Bang<tm> for Saturday?
3. The scope of such an activity. Just trash/flash or more of a
general costume thing?
4. Coupled with RHPS, or stand-alone?
My thinking tends to be a long the line of if it's a priority for some of
our organizers, they will plan it.
I suggest that those who want to see such an activity happen continue
the discussion and if there is interest, begin planning. Provide details.
If it is to happen, it's time for those who want to see it happen to
volunteer to make it happen.
For those not interested in participating in the planning of this
activity, please feel free to provide input, but please resist the
temptation to micromanage. Let those who want to plan it, plan it. You
will get a vote, if you wish, on the final say of placing such an
activity on the schedule.
For those who DON'T want to see this happen, make a motion (or second)
for a yea/nay vote on the final placement of this activity on the
schedule if and when plans for such an activity are presented.
Comments?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary schedule of activities:
This schedule is preliminary and is subject to change
without notice.
Monday, May 3:
10:00am Trip to Rhyolite (Rhyolite)
1:00pm Lunch with or without Ginger (Sahara buffet)
5:00pm Happy Hour (TBD)
6:00pm Milano's dinner (Milano's)
8:00pm Welcome Celebration (Flex or Spotlight)
Tuesday, May 4:
12:30pm Boat cruise (Lake Mead)
1:00pm Lunch with or without Ginger (Sahara buffet)
1:30pm Bowling (Bowling alley)
5:00pm Happy Hour (TBD)
Wednesday, May 5:
9:00am Air Tours (Henderson Executive Airport)
1:00pm Lunch with or without Ginger (Sahara buffet)
2:00pm Shopping expedition (Primm or LV Premium Outlets)
5:00pm Happy Hour (Hard Rock Cafe)
6:00pm Hard Rock Dinner (Hard Rock Cafe)
Ev Secretaries Night (HRC)
10:00pm Karaoke (Goodtimes)
Ev Limo Tour (TBD)
Thursday, May 6:
AM-PM Art museum or exhibit (TBD)
1:00pm Lunch with or without Ginger (Sahara buffet)
PM Indoor skydiving (Flyaway)
PM Glamour Boutique Open House (Glamour Boutique)
4:00pm High Tea (TBD)
5:00pm Happy Hour (TBD)
Friday, May 7:
AM-PM Golf (Desert Rose)
1:00pm Lunch with or without Ginger (Sahara buffet)
5:00pm Happy Hour (Carluccio's)
6:00pm Carluccio's Dinner (Carluccio's Tivoli Gardens)
7:30pm Annual Mixer (Goodtimes)
Saturday, May 8:
11:00am SBS Garden Party (Mindy's residence)
5:00pm Happy Hour (TBD)
12:00m Rocky Horror Picture Show (Highly tentative)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Administrivia:
This is the Diva Las Vegas 2004 organizational list.
One address for all items regarding this list, additions, removals,
changes, submissions, questions, etc.:
dlvorg@geekbabe.com <--- NOTE: all lower case
Please do not send binary attachments (photos, etc.) directly to the
list, as the list processor will not properly handle them. If you want
to send photos and the like, mail to: annie@annie.net
Archives of this list appear on the web at:
http://www.geekbabe.com/annie/org04arc/
To unsubscribe: Simply reply to this message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE
in either the Subject: field or the first line of an OTHERWISE BLANK
message body. The word "unsubscribe" (case is insignificant) should be
the only item in the subject field or the first line of the message,
justified to the left.
To send material to this list: Send submission as regular e-mail to
the address: dlvorg@geekbabe.com
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:49:03 CDT
