From: annie@ivgate.omahug.org
Date: Tue Nov 15 2005 - 21:49:30 CST
>Michelle (who has clearly gone blond!)
Oh, I was most definitely prematurely blonde last night! :) :(
>Exactly what dates have been nominated so far?
As of this minute and second, only the timeframe of April 17 - 23 has
been nominated. In fact, it was nominated and seconded twice when I
was hastily catching up with mail and forwarded it to the list and
asked for a second. :)
I think another one may be in the mail, but ...
>Also, Annie, can you resend the e-mail that summarised which weeks were no
>go because of key organisers not being able to attend.
Yes, coming shortly under separate cover.
>Just a thought:
>Why don't we just list all the weeks and get everyone to respond with
>which weeks are OK for them. This will probably highlight 2,3 or 4 that
>are popular and lets just use them for the vote. Know its two phase but
>raw numbers are better than the seemingly endless comments on I can do
>this week but not that!!!
Actually, that's a good idea. Let's ask everybody to note briefly (as in
yes or no) on the proposed and mentioned timeframes which ones are good
and bad for them.
The one timeframe seems to have the most public support now, but if
there are some issues it will let us know where we stand with the
others.
> Maybe it isn't a very good thought?????
I think it's a good idea. I'm sure not everybody will do that, but we
can keep a record and compile it and post the results.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 06 2006 - 16:16:53 CDT