This posting is from: kumiko yvonne watanabe
----------
>No one should be required to dress down to " todays standard level"
Hello Jamie,
I think this issue was settled by what was said earlier:
>>To make a long story short, there will be NO
>>relaxation of BDR during Diva Las Vegas.
So the BDR is the standard we all will abide or be required to follow.
Also to define it better:
>>The BDR guidelines are in place for a reason. That
>>reason is to protect the 99% of the people that come
>>to DLV. The protection I'm referring to is from those
>>who want, what Annie calls, a "dressing free-for-all".
On your comment:
>Why bother!! Annie is the best example of dressing down to.. Well why
>dress at all she looks like the boy next door. If that is passing?
>So be ot.
In my opinion, I DO NOT agree with this statement. Here's why:
Yes Annie dresses CASUAL, which is a big difference from "boy next
door".
NO she does NOT look like the "boy next door". The "boy next door"
doesn't wear boobs or put on make-up, which includes lipstick and nail
polish, wear women's jewelry, and carries a woman's bag.
She has make-up on, and FULLY dresses the part which is casual.
In fact while observing her by herself in the general public, I have
NOT seen any major type of head turning or gawking that is associated
with being read, in other words NO red-necking and public outbursts of
comments or movements to pointing her out as a tg or cd when she walks
around in casinos or in public.
I would say yes, that IS passing.
What is your criteria for 'passing'?
I have never seen her go partially dressed, if that is what you are
referring to by the statement "boy next door" look. It has always been
either Annie or her brother.
----------
(This posting was entered by kumiko yvonne watanabe, an external user of MyDLV.)