by External Poster » Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:59 am
This posting is from: annie
----------
>What's with all of the sour grapes so early in the process folks?
Speaking very freely (do I never not?) ...
This year, unfortunately, there were some disappointments regarding
DLV. :(
There was also a tension in the air regarding one rather divisive issue.
(some, maybe many) People took sides, friendships were strained or
broken over it, and nobody involved, or even observing, was happy about
it.
We also had a number of cases where the level of service we expected
from our providers was substandard, and not what we were used to.
Our volunteer force was strained and stressed when we had to deal with
a chain-reaction necessity to reschedule much of the ending part of
the event.
There was also some bitching about dress and deportment, but this was
not about increased attention to it, but bitching about us failing to
take action when those who should know better quite blatantly ignored
the dress/behavior guidelines.
The overall climate was negatively impacted by all of these factors.
With all of the comments about things that were wrong, however, we must
remember that there were a lot of things right with DLV 2005. Many of
the people had a good time, and most of our activities did go off as
planned and were rated highly.
People have high expectations of DLV. We've gotten the reputation of
being a first-tier T* event over the years and if things slip, there
will be disappointments.
>Life goes on! Lets work on making 2006 a much smoother operation as
Yes, and I see that many of these points of disappointment do have a
fairly obvious fix.
>I know of one 5 year attendee that was a big sister for someone new
>this year that just was plain old rude and ignored the Big Sister, even
If it were my call, people such as rude LS's and certain self-centered
dorks would be placed on a "no invite" list for next year's event.
>A few think a Spandex tennis skort, a tube top, and 6" platform Cork
>wedge heels look good for lunch at Paris ... That is one thing we
>REALLY need to work on and stay focused on. The process of pointing out
>the wardrobe disfunction at an event and making that person go back and
>change seems to be the only way to make it work.
Again, if it were my call, those who blatantly ignored the dress
guidelines (I am thinking of 3 individuals in particular, we can go over
the details in ORG) would be placed on a "no invite" list for the next
year's event. They are in essence saying "f*ck you" to the guidelines
and IMAO do not possess the proper attitude for DLV!
Plans are being made for follow-up regarding those individuals, and you
can be assured that action will be taken should anybody pull those
stunts at DLV 2006!
>Lastly, Annie, you are DLV. Just like Wine is from Grapes and Old
>Mustangs are what Ford was once, you are and will always be DLV.
Well, uh, this is the first time I can remember being compared to an
old Mustang ...
But seriously, I do appreciate the nice words and the support. I'm glad
that people appreciate what I do and have done. Hopefully this will
continue for those who will end up doing what I'm doing. (And remember,
I'm not dead yet!)
>With all of that said, I know I just volunteered for something but damn
>if I know what it is.
Just repeat those words over on ORG. If everybody will just volunteer
to coordinate or assist with one nontrivial activity and follow through
and make sure things are covered, we will have a very good slate of
activities for DLV 2006.
----------
(This posting was entered by annie, an external user of MyDLV.)