Re: Date timeframes being considered ...

From: Denise McCracken (dmcrack@cox.net)
Date: Mon Nov 14 2005 - 07:12:23 CST

• Next message: Denise McCracken: "Re: Date timeframes being considered ..."
• Previous message: Susan and Margie: "Re: Please read - Important - DLV 2006 dates under review ..."
• Maybe in reply to: annie: "Date timeframes being considered ..."
• Next in thread: Sarah Charles: "Re: Date timeframes being considered ..."

>I just sent a note to the National Association of Broadcasters and told
>them, in no uncertain terms, that they needed to move their convention
>to a different date.

ROFL! I wonder how much discussion these guys had to go through to decide on a date.

-d

• Next message: Denise McCracken: "Re: Date timeframes being considered ..."
• Previous message: Susan and Margie: "Re: Please read - Important - DLV 2006 dates under review ..."
• Maybe in reply to: annie: "Date timeframes being considered ..."
• Next in thread: Sarah Charles: "Re: Date timeframes being considered ..."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 12 2006 - 19:58:26 CDT