dlvorg Re: Vote results, timeframe notes, etc. ...

From: annie@ivgate.omahug.org
Date: Mon Nov 14 2005 - 18:21:56 CST


>I already seconded this timeframe. I believe Aiko already put these dates
>into consideration.

Ok, >>DUH<< Sorry.

Maybe I'm going prematurely blonde! :) :(

I just assumed nobody would re-nominate a timeframe that had already
been nominated. I'm sitting here wading thru e-mail and just sent that
one on with the call for a second.

>It is getting more confusing by the day. We already have many
>possibilities under consideration. Isn't it time to put forth the
>dates for a vote?

We have many possibilities under consideration, but as of this day,
hour, minute, and second, only one of them has actually been placed
into nomination and has been seconded.

Although some may disagree, and I agree that I may have jumped the gun
here, I don't see any way we can fairly make a decision or cut off
input/discussion, etc., prior to November 30, which is the day I
announced originally.

Again, I'm sorry if I sent that out prematurely or exceeded my authority
in doing so, but the deed has been done.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 06 2006 - 16:16:53 CDT